Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37990 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2006 09:31:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Oct 2006 09:31:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 66233 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2006 09:31:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 66196 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2006 09:31:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 66185 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2006 09:31:34 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.84) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Oct 2006 02:31:34 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= Received: from [62.24.64.34] ([62.24.64.34:49647] helo=slimak.dkm.cz) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 2.1.1.8 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 13/D2-00170-A5F73254 for ; Wed, 04 Oct 2006 02:31:14 -0700 Received: (qmail 2209 invoked by uid 0); 4 Oct 2006 09:29:20 -0000 Received: from r141.net.upc.cz (HELO ?192.168.1.1?) (62.24.83.141) by slimak.dkm.cz with SMTP; 4 Oct 2006 09:29:20 -0000 Message-ID: <45237EEF.7030803@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 11:29:19 +0200 From: Vlastimil Babka User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060917) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: nodeps jar References: <20061003181106.97518.qmail@web55109.mail.re4.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20061003181106.97518.qmail@web55109.mail.re4.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 OpenPGP: id=4E61DE84; url=subkeys.pgp.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Matt Benson wrote: > Dangerous and/or just kind of weird. :) I can check > whether the launcher classes are used. Even if this > is the case, however, ant-core uses launcher classes > and doesn't duplicate them in the jar. ant.jar > requires ant-launcher.jar, so I don't see why > ant-nodeps.jar shouldn't do the same. > I'm building/using ant-nodeps.jar without launcher classes for some time and didn't run into troubles, so I suppose they are not used. It's just unneeded duplication that nobody noticed, it seems. - -- Vlastimil Babka (Caster) Gentoo/Java -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFI37ttbrAj05h3oQRAixDAJsGkGTZFUMAvSdnLHlinvnMTlq/wwCdHJi5 KQdXRoPcpncJemsksel7Vdk= =QVEt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org