Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81123 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2006 17:38:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Sep 2006 17:38:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 49663 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2006 17:38:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 49627 invoked by uid 500); 1 Sep 2006 17:38:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 49610 invoked by uid 99); 1 Sep 2006 17:38:25 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:38:25 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [217.160.128.107] (HELO www.samaflost.de) (217.160.128.107) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 10:38:23 -0700 Received: by www.samaflost.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D34E88FD274; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 19:38:02 +0200 (CEST) To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: Re: What should an Antlib distribution look like? X-Draft-From: ("nnfolder:mail.jakarta-ant" 75539) References: From: Stefan Bodewig Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 19:38:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Jan Materne's message of "Fri, 1 Sep 2006 08:41:24 +0200") Message-ID: <87wt8nmqrp.fsf@www.samaflost.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Jan Materne wrote: > bin-distro [1] > * It would be nice to have a readable version of the > contributors.xml. Can be generated with an xsl like [2]. done. > * Empty etc/ directory? fixed (if it is empty, it won't end up in the distribution). > * I would prefer a manual with an Ant-style: with a navigation on > the left. And for screenreader maybe with div-containers, not > frames. The TODO list says ,---- | * make docs a little bit more accessible `---- which can certainly involve "make them prettier". But let's become real, there is now way that anything I did would be prettied than what we have. Be my guest. ;-) > * The manual has a mixture of two styles (compare csc and msbuild) True, will be fixed before the final release. > * no doap-file Would we want to distribute it? I'll add one to svn. > src-distro [3] > * no build.xml in root directory? oops, fixed. > * POM: no dependency on JUnit + AntUnit for testing This is intentional, ask Steve. > What is with "infrastructure" of Ant core like > - check.xml would require some work. Does it make sense to add it to a distribution? > - fetch.xml Not necessary, there is nothing to fetch. > - patch.xml We can expect users to have Ant around. Do we want to ship patch.xml with every Antlib? Thanks Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org