Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 24449 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2006 18:45:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Sep 2006 18:45:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 48591 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2006 18:45:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 48553 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2006 18:45:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 48542 invoked by uid 99); 5 Sep 2006 18:45:14 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Sep 2006 11:45:14 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of ddevienne@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.189] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Sep 2006 11:45:13 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x29so36231nfb for ; Tue, 05 Sep 2006 11:44:52 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=e6ROfHcXX7FOxaJAnb2tHdw3vBpRON3qN4mxzN9OXJkOWCddNyDkecW1UeQHlPKT6rBrw9CG/c5TOIio1xphleBte1BrU2KBYYp+Y2SoFRR4kN5uStWbkou8cEJVxYZihSE7lrgAD0DhlLR9+akThNvblk/QxROuL4EfOdb8PFw= Received: by 10.48.162.15 with SMTP id k15mr8145247nfe; Tue, 05 Sep 2006 11:44:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.64.15 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 11:44:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <255d8d690609051144y6cb4e01yea6a82ab41400568@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:44:52 -0500 From: "Dominique Devienne" To: "Ant Developers List" Subject: Re: antunit integration In-Reply-To: <20060905182803.81576.qmail@web55110.mail.re4.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <255d8d690609051039o43739d40xb20e6bea3e7deee5@mail.gmail.com> <20060905182803.81576.qmail@web55110.mail.re4.yahoo.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > But I'm more worried about the bootstrapping issue, > > This chicken-and-egg issue was discussed before; I am > unfortunately too lazy to go find it in the archives, > but the answer was that Ant does not bootstrap antunit > to run its own tests; rather a built antunit is used > with Ant in pretty much the same way junit is. IOW, > just drop an antunit jar into ant/lib and away we go. > Acceptable? Right, I should go look for that thread. I'm midly OK with this only. Strictly speaking, AntUnit is not required the compile Ant during bootstrapping, just testing it. I guess if gump is happy with it, why shouldn't I be... Although I'm curious to know how this chicken-and-egg thing is resolved in Gump. Are is that where svn:external comes into play, and AntUnit is compiled with Ant, joining them at the hip, to avoid the issue completely? --DD --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org