ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Peter Reilly" <peter.kitt.rei...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [AntUnit] Is extending ConditionBase really that bad?
Date Wed, 13 Sep 2006 08:34:15 GMT
It should extend ConditionBase.


On 9/13/06, Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> as I stated in another thread, I don't feel bad for extending
> ConditionBase but if a majority here would prefer AsserTask to stick
> with a simple add(Condition) in a task derived class, I'd be up for it
> as well.  I'd only want to see this straightened out before we release
> the first AntUnit beta, which is why I'll try drive this to a closure
> pretty quickly.
>
> Can we have a little poll here, please:
>
> (1) Would you prefer a version of AssertTask that didn't extend
>     ConditionBase?


No



If so
>
> (2) Would you want AntUnit to silently typedef all existing conditions
>     into the AntUnit namespace?  People wouldn't even notice.
>
>     or
>
>     Would you prefer users to explicitly use an antlib to use the
>     existing core conditions?
>
> Stefan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message