ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Benson <gudnabr...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: [AntUnit] Is extending ConditionBase really that bad?
Date Wed, 13 Sep 2006 15:22:16 GMT
--- Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> as I stated in another thread, I don't feel bad for
> extending
> ConditionBase but if a majority here would prefer
> AsserTask to stick
> with a simple add(Condition) in a task derived
> class, I'd be up for it
> as well.  I'd only want to see this straightened out
> before we release
> the first AntUnit beta, which is why I'll try drive
> this to a closure
> pretty quickly.
> 
> Can we have a little poll here, please:
> 
> (1) Would you prefer a version of AssertTask that
> didn't extend
>     ConditionBase?

I wouldn't fight it, but I don't see the need,
personally.

-Matt

> 
> If so
> 
> (2) Would you want AntUnit to silently typedef all
> existing conditions
>     into the AntUnit namespace?  People wouldn't
> even notice.
> 
>     or
> 
>     Would you prefer users to explicitly use an
> antlib to use the
>     existing core conditions?
> 
> Stefan
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@ant.apache.org
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message