Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 54571 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2006 06:55:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Aug 2006 06:55:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 45247 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2006 06:55:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 45205 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2006 06:55:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 45191 invoked by uid 99); 29 Aug 2006 06:55:47 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.109.238.66] (HELO dnsinet.rzf-nrw.de) (193.109.238.66) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 23:55:46 -0700 Received: from z011100.bk.fin.local (z011104.bk.fin.local [172.18.101.140]) by dnsinet.rzf-nrw.de (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7T6sUv8014062 for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:54:32 +0200 Received: from z011134.bk.fin.local ([130.11.7.134]) by z011100.bk.fin.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:54:32 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: AW: Building Ant 1.7beta Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:54:32 +0200 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Building Ant 1.7beta Thread-Index: AcbLIeHYtaoO0eB0TqmRJiEW0ZYg3QAFeG+g From: To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Aug 2006 06:54:33.0164 (UTC) FILETIME=[FB9CE0C0:01C6CB37] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >> I've grumbled in the past that it is not very friendly for Ant trunk=20 >> sources to be unbuildable by the current Ant release, but another=20 >> committer (I forget now who) said this was intentional...? > >Might have been me. > >Sometimes we build new features that are useful enough to=20 >apply the right away in Ant's own build file. It would have=20 >been silly to not use in Ant 1.2, not use =20 >in Ant 1.6.0's build.xml where either of both saved us a=20 >couple of lines and made the build file far more readable. > >Stefan Especially: you know only the Ant src-version present (the current version). You dont know which binary-version of Ant is installed (Ant 1.6.5, 1.5, 14?) That means your buildfile must be "very" bwc ... Jan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org