Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 45230 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2006 03:50:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Aug 2006 03:50:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 46462 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2006 03:49:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 46427 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2006 03:49:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 46416 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2006 03:49:58 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:49:58 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [217.160.128.107] (HELO www.samaflost.de) (217.160.128.107) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:49:58 -0700 Received: by www.samaflost.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D58A98FD26F; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 05:49:36 +0200 (CEST) To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: Re: classloader for 1.7 X-Draft-From: ("nnfolder:mail.jakarta-ant" 75159) References: <87k6506rh6.fsf@www.samaflost.de> From: Stefan Bodewig Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 05:49:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Peter Reilly's message of "Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:26:26 +0100") Message-ID: <871wr6lrn3.fsf@www.samaflost.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Peter Reilly wrote: > The one in 1.6 does not work. Didn't know that. > The proposed one is totally different. But its intention is the same and so my opinion is the same, add a warning to the docs and it's OK. The only thing I'd be concerned about is timing. You'd need to have it inside of Ant before Antoine put together the beta release. I probably won't find the time to help, so not a +1 but certainly not a -1 either. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org