Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 66340 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2006 15:24:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Jun 2006 15:24:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 91778 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2006 15:24:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 91738 invoked by uid 500); 30 Jun 2006 15:24:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 91727 invoked by uid 99); 30 Jun 2006 15:24:41 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 08:24:41 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [209.237.227.198] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (209.237.227.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 08:24:40 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id B0AA441033E; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:23:01 +0000 (GMT) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39926] - StarTeam tasks do not identify themselves as a particular application In-Reply-To: X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Message-Id: <20060630152301.B0AA441033E@brutus.apache.org> Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:23:01 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39926 ------- Additional Comments From BBurgess@tiaa-cref.org 2006-06-30 15:23 ------- Yeah, that would work. Seems a little complex, but it would be a necesary evil to keep support for SDK versions prior to 6.0 - should we though? I for one am all for dropping support of SDK versions prior to 6.0, as Borland already has (see http://support.borland.com/entry.jspa?externalID=139&categoryID=47). In fact, evern 6.0 is no longer supporterd after October 31, 2006. There would need to be some sort of polling of the StarTeam/Ant community for this type of decission I assume. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org