Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 63486 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2006 06:30:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jun 2006 06:30:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 92621 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2006 06:30:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 92587 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2006 06:30:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 92576 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2006 06:30:32 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 23:30:32 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,NO_REAL_NAME,UPPERCASE_25_50 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [209.237.227.198] (HELO brutus.apache.org) (209.237.227.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 23:30:31 -0700 Received: by brutus.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 92FD67141F4; Wed, 28 Jun 2006 06:28:56 +0000 (GMT) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18988] - and can use names of non-existent targets In-Reply-To: X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Message-Id: <20060628062856.92FD67141F4@brutus.apache.org> Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 06:28:56 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18988 jan@materne.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME ------- Additional Comments From jan@materne.de 2006-06-28 06:28 ------- Maybe not a really need for that. Especially since and target override. And there is the