Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 9574 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2005 11:24:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2005 11:24:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 76942 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2005 11:24:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 76582 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2005 11:24:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 76571 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2005 11:24:25 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 03:24:25 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [192.6.10.60] (HELO tobor.hpl.hp.com) (192.6.10.60) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Nov 2005 03:24:20 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921903708A for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:24:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tobor.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tobor.hpl.hp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 20024) with LMTP id 08795-04 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:24:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kropotkin.hpl.hp.com (kropotkin.hpl.hp.com [15.144.59.2]) by tobor.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CFE37069 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:24:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kropotkin.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571615D8F for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:24:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kropotkin.hpl.hp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kropotki [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06300-01-5 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:24:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from timmay.hpl.hp.com (timmay-hb.hpl.hp.com [15.144.59.39]) by kropotkin.hpl.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC50250E7 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:24:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [15.144.25.135] (chamonix.hpl.hp.com [15.144.25.135]) by timmay.hpl.hp.com (8.13.2/8.13.2) with ESMTP id jA3BNuPQ000849 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:23:56 GMT Message-ID: <4369F34C.3000604@apache.org> Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 11:23:56 +0000 From: Steve Loughran User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: Guidelines for executing delegate tasks? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-HPLB-IMAP-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the Helpdesk for more information X-HPLB-IMAP-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-HPLB-IMAP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0, required 5) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at kropotkin.hpl.hp.com X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hplb.hpl.hp.com X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jeffrey E Care wrote: > The more I think about it the more I'm convinced that the best way to > address this problem is to change the thread/task registration to be a > stack rather than the current single value implementation. This would > safely handle any rogue usage of "perform" where "execute" would be > preferred, while maintaining the current behavior. > > Any thoughts? stacks are good. as long as they are popped properly :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org