Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10822 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2005 14:31:09 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Sep 2005 14:31:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 2122 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2005 14:31:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 1753 invoked by uid 500); 21 Sep 2005 14:31:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 1740 invoked by uid 99); 21 Sep 2005 14:31:06 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:31:06 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [66.11.167.126] (HELO smtp.istop.com) (66.11.167.126) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 07:31:14 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (jpfiset.ott.istop.com [66.11.174.172]) by smtp.istop.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7002B3C5 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:33:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <43316E94.5020902@fiset.ca> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:30:44 -0400 From: JP Fiset User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: Fileset and Custom Fileset in Ant 1.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I am interested in developing a custom fileset. After reading the mail archives, it appears that much work is currently happening to allow custom file sets in 1.7. Looking at the trunk implementation, I see that this change will affect all fileset-based tasks. Can anyone comment on the impact of those changes as to the compatibility of fileset-based tasks between 1.6 and 1.7? After reviewing the code (without testing my assumptions), it looks like: 1. Fileset-based tasks written to take advantage of ResourceCollection instead of FileSet will not run in Ant prior to 1.7 2. Fileset-based tasks written prior to 1.7 (dependent on FileSet) will not be able to support custom file sets, even if running in 1.7 Are my assumptions right? JP --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org