Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4777 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2005 03:40:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Aug 2005 03:40:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 68794 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2005 03:40:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 68735 invoked by uid 500); 15 Aug 2005 03:40:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 68722 invoked by uid 99); 15 Aug 2005 03:40:00 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:40:00 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of foamdino@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.198 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.198] (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:40:20 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 50so1024201wri for ; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:39:58 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BILnRY8qf/sfB+g3TuMCOcclpuTK+/n+LD4UNITpHp+k2GbLO5VoCLXRBjEZven0oJj5wTYYIkhikYoruAi3P+YX59lL0mWIJgpbIXUwf+TOjPF50IGIHXnmWjuMkf2l2fk1e5zPglb+Y2tV68TSoQWxCQV/LTh0lgk1JRf6DHw= Received: by 10.54.144.9 with SMTP id r9mr3338813wrd; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:39:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.142.1 with HTTP; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:39:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:39:58 +0700 From: Kevin Jackson To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: AW: Manual + xdocs etc In-Reply-To: <000901c5a0c0$71e27a40$030200c0@DJ0X820J> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <3CD9A35A043C094EA8773DBB698E801B0376D0C3@z011134.bk.fin.local> <42FC2B87.2040403@it.fts-vn.com> <000901c5a0c0$71e27a40$030200c0@DJ0X820J> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Yeah I suppsoe we have that possibility. If we have separate docs though they aren't spatially related to the code (which would be a nice feature IMO). Regarding source, we either have two separate sources (docs + code), or we have messy code sources. Seems like it would be better to have separate sources since most people are against having examples in the code. Kev --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org