From dev-return-68248-apmail-ant-dev-archive=ant.apache.org@ant.apache.org Tue Aug 02 19:01:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72987 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2005 19:01:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Aug 2005 19:01:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 64863 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2005 19:01:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 64812 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2005 19:01:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 64799 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2005 19:01:17 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 12:01:17 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of flamefew@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.199 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.199] (HELO zproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.162.199) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 12:01:07 -0700 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o37so1026885nzf for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 12:01:15 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eTp4f1OKavjUlgVRjcxV6mxTAAkeRTm3NpQ8fZcEpqGZmiatzT+w7cBm6X+pY49dq/qKrADuyUlh+TtqvPPzJ539dJzy/jGfFn2x1OiyXgIN8nvezQWbdaVWti/bb1Qr4mV2nkpv1miSUtrvs7ZrmlUL4xxUvZDmwnXc2PJW44o= Received: by 10.36.222.7 with SMTP id u7mr91817nzg; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 12:01:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.13.5 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Aug 2005 12:01:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <31cc373605080212012ca5682f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 15:01:15 -0400 From: Henri Yandell Reply-To: Henri Yandell To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: Re: Subversion migration? In-Reply-To: <31cc373605072910553719cff6@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <31cc373605072910553719cff6@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N To accompany the ongoing vote, I've setup a test Ant migration. https://svn.apache.org/repos/test/ant/ svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/test/ant/trunk ant I've made the huge assumption that the Ant TLP have only one codebase and haven't structured it in an umbrella way. I'm not sure if ant-antidote is live and needs to be a part of the migration too. SVN is hierarchical, so you'd end up with something like: ant/ core/ trunk/ branches/ tags/ antidote/ trunk/ branches/ tags/ Currently it's just: ant/ trunk/ branches/ tags/ Anyway, give it a try if you want and let me which strategy seems to make sense for Ant; ie) where do you want antidote? Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org