ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Igor Peshansky <ig...@us.ibm.com>
Subject Re: XJ - xml extension for Java
Date Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:09:56 GMT
Jess Holle wrote on 07/10/2005 10:10:57 PM:

> Kevin Jackson wrote:
> [snip]
> >I agree that pushing the correctness problem into the compilation,
> >instead of the runtime phase is valuable in general.
> 
> Exactly.
> 
> Compile-time checking wherever it is net time savings to the developer 
> and does not hinder runtime performance is a very good thing.  In the 
> case of generics, I believe they're a big time saver overall.

(To get this thread back on topic).
Well, I'm glad you both think so, because this is exactly what XJ provides
with respect to XML processing code. :-)
        Igor
-- 
Igor Peshansky  (note the spelling change!)
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
XJ: No More Pain for XML?s Gain (http://www.research.ibm.com/xj/)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message