Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 27627 invoked from network); 17 May 2005 23:38:15 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 May 2005 23:38:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 95908 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2005 17:42:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 95758 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2005 17:42:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 95629 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2005 17:42:51 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: 62.96.16.111 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of bodewig@apache.org) Received: from bodewig.bost.de (HELO bodewig.bost.de) (62.96.16.111) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2005 10:42:48 -0700 Received: (from bodewig@localhost) by bodewig.bost.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) id j4HE5Fq09663; Tue, 17 May 2005 16:05:15 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to bodewig@apache.org using -f To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: Re: mapping in zipfileset X-Draft-From: ("nnfolder:mail.jakarta-ant" 68574) References: <4288C183.905@apache.org> From: Stefan Bodewig Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 16:05:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4288C183.905@apache.org> (Steve Loughran's message of "Mon, 16 May 2005 16:51:31 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.17 (Jumbo Shrimp, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Mon, 16 May 2005, Steve Loughran wrote: > With you can do it via an intermediate > directory. Question is, should we make it easier? Will be easier with ResourceCollections. Path will be a ResourceCollection and can directly work on a path then. At least that's been my understanding of it. > -allow a path as a param for zip/jar/war/ear, with all the > zipfileset options Maybe we'll add a ResourceCollection alternative to ? > -allow you to specify a for all zipfilesets. We should make it even more generic IMHO. Provide it as a data-type for or as well. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org