Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Subject: Bugzilla or dev-list (was Re: [Bug 28444]  - Import: Target
 Handling Bug)
References: <20050512154604.10624.qmail@web30901.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
From: Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 21:25:14 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20050512154604.10624.qmail@web30901.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (Matt
 Benson's message of "Thu, 12 May 2005 08:46:04 -0700 (PDT)")
Message-ID: <m38y2k457p.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.17 (Jumbo Shrimp, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

On Thu, 12 May 2005, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Here's my comment from the bug since Stefan wants to
> be on-list:  :)

I'll go back to the original thread in a minute, just wanted to
explain why I asked Peter to discuss it on the list.

When I see bugzilla reports that look as if some committer has talen
care of it, I tend to ignore subsequent mails from the report,  This
means I could be missing a discussion thread.

Furthermore I live and breathe in my mail client all day, I hate it
when I have to leave it to respond to a mail.  Some bug tracking
systems can be used by email as well, I even think Bugzilla could, but
not our installation.  If I have to start a brwoser in order to write
the two-character sequence "+1", I may just not do it.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org