Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 62215 invoked from network); 17 May 2005 10:48:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 May 2005 10:48:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 41891 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2005 00:13:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 41832 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2005 00:13:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 41765 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2005 00:13:07 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from ajax-1.apache.org (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 May 2005 17:13:07 -0700 Received: by ajax.apache.org (Postfix, from userid 99) id 9D4962F3; Tue, 17 May 2005 02:12:12 +0200 (CEST) From: bugzilla@apache.org To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34941] New: - FTP uptodate calculations wrong X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo Message-Id: <20050517001212.9D4962F3@ajax.apache.org> Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 02:12:12 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34941 Summary: FTP uptodate calculations wrong Product: Ant Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Optional Tasks AssignedTo: dev@ant.apache.org ReportedBy: scohen@apache.org Given the following task call If this is executed a second time, all files included in the fileset will be retrieved regardless of whether or not they have changed on the server in the intervening time interval. This is because the underlying uptodate logic is returning false if the source and destination timestamps are equal. Logically, it should be true. Logically, any file where the local file's timestamp is greater than or equal to the remote file's timestamp is up to date. Any file whose local timestamp is less than its remote file's timestamp is not. But that's not the current implementation. A similar issue exists on put. The fix is easy to implement and I will do it, but I want to give the community a chance to comment before implementing. There may be a use case for the existing functionality that I am not understanding, or there may be an important backward compatibility issue that I am missing. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org