Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31783 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2005 17:19:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Apr 2005 17:19:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 91483 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2005 17:19:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 91341 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2005 17:19:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 91306 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2005 17:19:18 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from Unknown (HELO cellectivity.com) (212.18.242.163) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:19:15 -0700 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: ResourceCollections Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 18:20:04 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: ResourceCollections Thread-index: AcVE7uI3LJp0MRAkTZSD6VhHn135bwAFCWkg From: "Jose Alberto Fernandez" To: "Ant Developers List" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > From: Matt Benson [mailto:gudnabrsam@yahoo.com]=20 >=20 > --- Jose Alberto Fernandez > wrote: > > > From: Matt Benson [mailto:gudnabrsam@yahoo.com] > > >=20 > > > --- Jose Alberto Fernandez > > > > > wrote: > > >=20 > > > > All this discussion about roles brings me back > > to > > > > the > > > > proposal/implementation > > > > of Roles that I made a long time ago and that > > was > > > > rejected. > > >=20 >=20 > After thinking about this further, this would be okay > for inline usage of duplicate names but is still > inferior to using Antlibs for scoping in that types > can stand alone at the project level (with id > normally) in the latter scheme, and referenced later.=20 > A small distinction perhaps, but I like to be able to > declare things I intend to reuse at a high level > rather than naming them during their first use. I agree with you in principle. However, I do not think every little bit of XML is a good candidate for id'ing.=20 You may ID a or a but a on its own makes less sense since you usually need to look at its meaning in the context of the usage. You can always find a counterexample of course but as a general rule... To me name overloading makes sense for a very limited number of=20 very much used things as for a condition or a selector, is a good example. I am sure others can come with other cases. Forcing usage of namespaces is the same as forcing new different names for everything. In particular in core. Jose Alberto --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org