ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Martijn Kruithof ...@kruithof.xs4all.nl>
Subject Re: ResourceCollections
Date Fri, 15 Apr 2005 21:36:18 GMT

> But wouldn't that defeat the whole purpose of the <fill in role-type 
> here> I thought the whole point was avoiding having addConcrete in 
> favour of having add(Role).

What basically is that what Matt just stated.


Apart from the variands A and B further below, would the following also 
work?

<project name="foo" default="bar">

<resourcecollection id="blah" xmlns="ant:set">
   <and>
       <files dir="foo" name="**/*.java"/>
       <date select="newer" date="2005/04/15"/>
   </and>
</resourcecollection>

</project>

or would this mean that the resoursecollection must be part of set itself?

===A===
<project name="foo" default="bar"
  xmlns:co="ant:condition"
   xmlns:set="ant:set">

<resourcecollection id="blah">
   <set:and>
       <set:files dir="foo" name="**/*.java"/>
       <set:date select="newer" date="2005/04/15"/>
   </set:and>
</resourcecollection>

</project>
  
===B===
<and xmlns="ant:conditions" />
<and xmlns="ant:fileselectors" />
<and xmlns="ant:resourceselectors" />
<date xmlns="ant:resourceselectors" />
<date xmlns="ant:resourcecomparators" />



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message