Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 2303 invoked from network); 9 Mar 2005 16:09:27 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Mar 2005 16:09:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 29525 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2005 16:09:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 29469 invoked by uid 500); 9 Mar 2005 16:09:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 29452 invoked by uid 99); 9 Mar 2005 16:09:23 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from junior.lgc.com (HELO junior.lgc.com) (134.132.72.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Mar 2005 08:09:22 -0800 Received: from lgchvw02.landmark.lgc.com (lgchvw02.lgc.com [134.132.93.108]) by junior.lgc.com (8.11.7/8.11.3) with SMTP id j29G9Lu11004 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:09:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from 134.132.72.99 by lgchvw02.landmark.lgc.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Wed, 09 Mar 2005 10:09:14 -0600 Received: from HOUEXCH903.landmark.lgc.com (houexch903 [134.132.167.43]) by junior.lgc.com (8.11.7/8.11.3) with ESMTP id j29G9FN10993 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:09:15 -0600 (CST) Received: from HOUEXCH902.landmark.lgc.com ([134.132.167.38]) by HOUEXCH903.landmark.lgc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:09:09 -0600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: FileSets with optional basedir and absolute paths for includes Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 10:09:08 -0600 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: FileSets with optional basedir and absolute paths for includes Thread-Index: AcUkv48fu8AwphnCRoyfgGlFlbJ1bAAAlArg From: "Dominique Devienne" To: "Ant Developers List" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Mar 2005 16:09:09.0170 (UTC) FILETIME=[536AF120:01C524C2] X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > From: Matt Benson [mailto:gudnabrsam@yahoo.com] > --- Peter Reilly wrote: > > The fact that a fileset has a directory base is I > > think its basic design. >=20 > I like mappers, don't get me wrong, but I have the > general feeling that different tasks may not always > use them the same way. I usually find myself having > to play a little to create a mapper to do exactly what > I want. This would be the same thing. Your filenames > are no longer relative; so what? Especially with the > container and chained mappers... if I have a fileset > rooted in ten different directories, even on different > roots (where available) I can set up a container > mapper to map each of them appropriately. I agree with Peter. I don't like this. I'm all for a true File Set datatype with no basedir, but not for retrofitting FileSet into this concept. Just create such a new type, like , which accepts nested filesets if you want, and adapt tasks can that conceptually deal with plain absolute file names, and leave the others alone dealing with FileSet. I'm balancing between a -1 and a -0 on this one... --DD --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org