Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4716 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2005 17:27:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 29 Mar 2005 17:27:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 81045 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2005 17:27:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 80820 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2005 17:27:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 80777 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2005 17:27:30 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from web30905.mail.mud.yahoo.com (HELO web30905.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.200.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:27:29 -0800 Received: (qmail 29537 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Mar 2005 17:27:23 -0000 Message-ID: <20050329172723.29535.qmail@web30905.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [65.247.233.95] by web30905.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:27:23 PST Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:27:23 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Benson Subject: RE: Re: Prototype work on XML+XSL based Ant doc To: Ant Developers List In-Reply-To: 6667 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --- Dominique Devienne wrote: > > From: Matt Benson [mailto:gudnabrsam@yahoo.com] > > The bugreport says you started w/ Introspection to > get > > here... I wonder if there is some way we can > combine > > this doc initiative with Kev Jackson's suggestions > on > > validation to set up some kind of > element/attribute > > matrix evaluation to define compatibility between > > attributes/elements. Better yet, get this > information > > into a single XML format used in documentation and > > referenced at runtime for validation and error > > reporting... > > > > Does that sound un-doable? > > From my POV, I have more than enough on my plate > trying to > sort the doc out ;-) I'll leave you explore this. > Until now > I've done fine doing my own validation, with little > utility > methods like assertNotNull, assertNotSet, etc... > --DD > Yeah, I didn't necessarily mean YOU should do it... :) I think we all need bigger plates. But that aside, I do find the idea interesting (though since it was at least partly mine I guess I would). Again the biggest win here would be--in theory--a single-shot at validating and documenting task configuration options. -Matt > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: > dev-help@ant.apache.org > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org