ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22901] - [Patch] -only option to execute target(s) without dependencies
Date Tue, 08 Mar 2005 22:53:45 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22901>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22901





------- Additional Comments From gudnabrsam@yahoo.com  2005-03-08 23:53 -------
Hmm.. I didn't see where you were going with the childExecutor before, but I
just looked at this again and I don't hate it.  After 1.6.3 comes out I don't
want to alter the Executor interface unless I have to so I will be thinking
about this.

Maybe when (if) we start doing Ant libraries there could be an executor library;
otherwise I don't necessarily want to get into adding a million of them to core.
 But would OnlyExecutor not want to return itself as a child?  If I add the
child I will probably do an AbstractExecutor with a default getChildExecutor()
{return this;} and make all existing Executors inherit from that.  Then I'd
probably add an executor attribute to the Ant task as well.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message