Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-62987-apmail-ant-dev-archive=ant.apache.org@ant.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 96645 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2005 15:32:42 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Jan 2005 15:32:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 79473 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2005 15:32:40 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org
Received: (qmail 79423 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2005 15:32:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dev-subscribe@ant.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@ant.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@ant.apache.org>
List-Id: "Ant Developers List" <dev.ant.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org
Received: (qmail 79410 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2005 15:32:39 -0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
	tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from junior.lgc.com (HELO junior.lgc.com) (134.132.72.99)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 07:32:38 -0800
Received: from lgchvw02.lgc.com (lgchvw02.lgc.com [134.132.93.108])
	by junior.lgc.com (8.11.7/8.11.3) with SMTP id j0EFWau22717
	for <dev@ant.apache.org>; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:32:36 -0600 (CST)
Received: from 134.132.72.99 by lgchvw02.lgc.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall
 NT); Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:32:31 -0600
Received: from HOUEXCH903.landmark.lgc.com (houexch903 [134.132.167.43])
	by junior.lgc.com (8.11.7/8.11.3) with ESMTP id j0EFWUN22704
	for <dev@ant.apache.org>; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:32:30 -0600 (CST)
Received: from HOUEXCH902.landmark.lgc.com ([134.132.167.38]) by
 HOUEXCH903.landmark.lgc.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211);
	 Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:32:24 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: DynamicConfigurator and friends
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:32:14 -0600
Message-ID: 
 <A672996F85AA7240A9DD2A455BD0D428877D97@HOUEXCH902.landmark.lgc.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: DynamicConfigurator and friends
Thread-Index: AcT6TZRrTeo2o1/wSde/k+BJ8v9/qAAAE/Gw
From: "Dominique Devienne" <DDevienne@lgc.com>
To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jan 2005 15:32:24.0812 (UTC)
 FILETIME=[3F361AC0:01C4FA4E]
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org]
>=20
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Dominique Devienne <DDevienne@lgc.com> wrote:
>=20
> > There's one last twist about text handling in Ant that I
> > discovered with a modified version of <echo> though: Ant
> > merges text nodes for an element, calling addText() only
> > once, so <a>b<c>d</c>e</a> does not call addText("b") and
> > later addText("e"), but addText("be"), so you don't get
> > the same DOM fragment as what's in the build file.
>=20
> Yes, I know.  Since most tasks don't support mixed content models,
> that is no problem for them.

Except by my custom <echo> which depended on mixed content ;-)
But I easily work around this by having explicit <text> elements
to get the correct ordering of elements/text nodes (which became
<text> elements themselves).

> It is a problem, but one that would be rather hard to fix without
> breaking BWC.

With a DynamicConfigurator-based impl of XMLFragment, yes.

But that's not the only way to implement it... ;-) --DD

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org