Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 88285 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2005 22:23:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jan 2005 22:23:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 64482 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2005 22:22:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 64395 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jan 2005 22:22:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 64278 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jan 2005 22:22:53 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from ajax-1.apache.org (HELO ajax.apache.org) (192.87.106.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:22:52 -0800 Received: from ajax.apache.org (ajax.apache.org [127.0.0.1]) by ajax.apache.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j06MMnOr027486 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:22:49 +0100 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by ajax.apache.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j06MMnVE027484; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:22:49 +0100 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:22:49 +0100 Message-Id: <200501062222.j06MMnVE027484@ajax.apache.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32977] - Ant handles ".." in paths incorrectly X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG� RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND� INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32977 ------- Additional Comments From ddevienne@lgc.com 2005-01-06 23:22 ------- Perhaps, for consistency's sake, but don't you agree nonetheless that failing in such a case is the right thing to do? If the logic of the build file expect something to be in .., if there is no such parent directory since already in the root directory, something's wrong, and the current error message is very explicit and tons better IMHO than silently equating . to .. because in the root dir. I would be -0 and almost -1 on such a change. --DD -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org