ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5035] - Patternset and fileset enhancements
Date Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:18:39 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5035>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5035





------- Additional Comments From gudnabrsam@yahoo.com  2005-01-07 01:18 -------
As for the "argument" over the implications of what we are talking about for
javac in particular, I see none, to be honest.  Javac doesn't actually deal in
filesets.  It composes an implicit fileset but you couldn't actually pass it a
fileset.  You could pass javac a dirset embedded in a src element, and the task
would scan each of the directories returned from listing the Path represented by
the src element.    Path appears to handle file|dirsets as I stated before, so
again, there should be no issue from a null directory.  There may be other cases
where a null directory will cause a problem, but from what I can tell so far
javac isn't one of them.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message