Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 88281 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2004 11:13:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Dec 2004 11:13:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 85338 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2004 11:13:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 85224 invoked by uid 500); 3 Dec 2004 11:13:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 85148 invoked by uid 99); 3 Dec 2004 11:13:36 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from bodewig.bost.de (HELO bodewig.bost.de) (62.96.16.111) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 03:13:34 -0800 Received: (from bodewig@localhost) by bodewig.bost.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) id iB3BDUT05379; Fri, 3 Dec 2004 12:13:30 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to bodewig@apache.org using -f To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: Re: [Patch] style changes to taskdefs/Rmic X-Draft-From: ("nnfolder:mail.jakarta-ant" 63739) References: <41B04895.5050508@it.fts-vn.com> From: Stefan Bodewig Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 12:13:30 +0100 In-Reply-To: <41B04895.5050508@it.fts-vn.com> (Kev Jackson's message of "Fri, 03 Dec 2004 18:05:57 +0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 03 Dec 2004, Kev Jackson wrote: > What is the policy w.r.t TLA's in method names? If the method is public or protected and the class has been part of Ant 1.6.2 and the method has been present, don't change its name ;-) > e.g. getIiopOpts versus getIIOPOpts ? > > or setIDLOpts versus setIdlOpts ? > > I think the all CAPS accronym is easier to read, I agree. > but I'm not sure if it breaks the style More likely backwards compatibility. Cheers Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org