ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23942] - Addition of a local property
Date Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:36:55 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23942>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23942

Addition of a local property





------- Additional Comments From gudnabrsam@yahoo.com  2004-10-21 14:36 -------
I also should have made the distinction between Jose's and Peter's <let>s.  And 
I can accept Jose's assertion that <let> is appropriate enough a name for his.

To continue in my search for feedback on the idea of declaring only those 
properties which persist beyond the theoretical local scope, let me throw this 
statement out:

If an explicit TaskContainer is used for local properties, it makes sense to 
declare the properties that are NOT local; if scope is made implicit to the 
nearest enclosing TaskContainer, it makes sense to declare which properties ARE 
local.  Opinions?!  ;)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message