ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23942] - Addition of a local property
Date Thu, 21 Oct 2004 10:57:55 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23942>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23942

Addition of a local property





------- Additional Comments From peterreilly@apache.org  2004-10-21 10:57 -------
As I said before, I would prefer an implicit local property container - target
and any task container.

If there is to be an explicit local property container, I do not care what name
it is, <localpropertyscope> is probally the best name.

let is used in emacs lisp for example:
  (let* ((type-and-name (jdok-extract-type-and-name declaration))
         (arglist       (jdok-extract-arglist       declaration))
         (throws        (jdok-extract-throws        declaration))
         (type          (car type-and-name))
         (name          (cdr type-and-name)))
    (if (or type name arglist throws)
        (vector type name arglist throws))))

but it is probally a little confusing as let is also used in
other languages like basic.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message