Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 17772 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2004 06:36:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2004 06:36:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 66428 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2004 06:36:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 66376 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2004 06:36:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 66360 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2004 06:36:41 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of brett.porter@gmail.com designates 64.233.170.200 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.170.200] (HELO mproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.170.200) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Sep 2004 23:36:40 -0700 Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 80so126924rnl for ; Mon, 06 Sep 2004 23:36:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.2.80 with SMTP id 80mr415687rnb; Mon, 06 Sep 2004 23:36:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.179.2 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Sep 2004 23:36:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9e3862d8040906233668130103@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:36:38 +1000 From: Brett Porter Reply-To: Brett Porter To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: Ant 1.6.3 In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <001101c4898c$83e116d0$1601a8c0@gloria> <412C5957.3040602@cortexebusiness.com.au> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > Wearing my Gump hat, this sounds really bad. If we introduce a new > feature in Ant we use Gump to testdrive it for backwards > compatibility. Having known bugs inside the test drive doesn't seem a > good idea to me. sounds like a feature request for gump: automatically merge the branch and fail if there are conflicts, then fall back to just using HEAD. (of course, it does not commit the merger, just does the cvs update -j ... -j ... bit). Would be an interesting experiment to see how often it blows up :) Cheers, Brett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org