Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 8543 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2004 08:53:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Sep 2004 08:53:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 44619 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2004 08:53:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 44581 invoked by uid 500); 20 Sep 2004 08:53:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 44567 invoked by uid 99); 20 Sep 2004 08:53:21 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.109.238.66] (HELO dnsinet.rzf-nrw.de) (193.109.238.66) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 01:53:20 -0700 Received: from z011104.bk.fin.local (z011104.bk.fin.local [193.109.238.140]) by dnsinet.rzf-nrw.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8K8rFvR030589 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:53:15 +0200 Received: by z011104.bk.fin.local with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:53:16 +0200 Message-ID: <879A5AD5DD0ED511891F0003473A9B560E23F631@Z011004> From: Jan.Materne@rzf.fin-nrw.de To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: AW: Where should the dotnet sandbox go? Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:53:15 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C49EEF.443AE7E0" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------_=_NextPart_001_01C49EEF.443AE7E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable IMO we should have the SVN tasks. Its too important, like the CVS = section. Jan > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:jalberto@cellectivity.com] > Gesendet am: Montag, 20. September 2004 10:49 > An: Ant Developers List > Betreff: RE: Where should the dotnet sandbox go? >=20 > I am also +1 for (3).=20 > I think there are more than one set of optional tasks that > could fit the picture of having its own separate development cycle > and antlib subprojects would be the natural place for them. >=20 > And talking about SVN, is there anyone interested on having > a full set of tasks (antlib) for SVN? Just as we have for=20 > other VCS. Or shall we ask the SVN community to provide one? >=20 > Jose Alberto >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org]=20 > > Sent: 20 September 2004 07:51 > > To: dev@ant.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Where should the dotnet sandbox go? > >=20 > >=20 > > On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Jan Materne = wrote: > >=20 > > > On the same reasons I would say (3). Especially we had=20 > spoken about=20 > > > breaking Ant into modules and moving to SVN ... (last=20 > year at your=20 > > > home, Stefan :) > >=20 > > Is it really that long ago 8-) > >=20 > > I'll wait a few more days to gather comments and may provide=20 > > a simple proposal for an antlib subproject. > >=20 > > Stefan > >=20 > >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org > >=20 > >=20 >=20 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org >=20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C49EEF.443AE7E0--