Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 81478 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2004 08:28:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2004 08:28:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 23021 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2004 08:27:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 22910 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2004 08:27:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 22775 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2004 08:27:10 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [193.109.238.66] (HELO dnsinet.rzf-nrw.de) (193.109.238.66) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 01:27:09 -0700 Received: from z011104.bk.fin.local (z011104.bk.fin.local [193.109.238.140]) by dnsinet.rzf-nrw.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i878R3vR012755 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 10:27:03 +0200 Received: by z011104.bk.fin.local with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 10:27:04 +0200 Message-ID: <879A5AD5DD0ED511891F0003473A9B560E23F58B@Z011004> From: Jan.Materne@rzf.fin-nrw.de To: dev@ant.apache.org Subject: AW: Ant 1.6.3 Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 10:27:03 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C494B4.743522C0" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------_=_NextPart_001_01C494B4.743522C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > I'd like to stop having to remember to merge stuff and validate that > > others thought of it as well, yes. > > > Does this mean that when we release 1.7.0 we do not make a 1.7 branch > anymore > and work on HEAD all the time ? can I delete the 16_branch locally? can I? can I? :-) > > Part of Conor's alternative I agreed with was that we could > release a 1.7.0 release even if there haven't been enough new features for our > > traditional understanding of increasing the minor version number. > > > We will have to change a few @since tags in the code, and > remove 1.6.3 from > Bugzilla. Quite doable actually. Does this need a vote, or do > we just do it? Because that would be the result of our consensus how to make releases in the future I think we need a vote. Jan ------_=_NextPart_001_01C494B4.743522C0--