ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steve Loughran <ste...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [GUMP@brutus]: ant/test-ant failed
Date Wed, 11 Aug 2004 16:04:59 GMT
Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
>>      [csc] ** ERROR **: file critical-sections.c: line 89 
>> (DeleteCriticalSection): assertion failed: (ret == 0)
>>      [csc] aborting...
>>
>> BUILD FAILED
>> /home/bodewig/repo/cvs/asf/ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional/dotnet.xml:155:

>> csc returned: 129
>>     at 
>> org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.dotnet.NetCommand.runCommand(NetCommand.java:293)

>>
>>
>> This looks fine from the Ant side and seems to be an issue with the
>> Mono installation (as expected).  Compilation succeeds but mono (the
>> VM running the compiler) fails with an error I've never seen before.
> 
> 
> Wild-arsed guess, but I wonder if Brutus' two CPUs have something to do 
> with this.

I have two real, two HT and dont encounter it.

top - 17:03:32 up 9 days,  4:50,  9 users,  load average: 0.13, 0.43, 0.33
Tasks: 144 total,   2 running, 142 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
  Cpu0 :  3.7% us,  2.0% sy,  0.0% ni, 94.0% id,  0.0% wa,  0.3% hi, 
0.0% si
  Cpu1 :  3.3% us,  1.3% sy,  0.0% ni, 95.0% id,  0.0% wa,  0.3% hi, 
0.0% si
  Cpu2 :  2.6% us,  1.0% sy,  0.0% ni, 96.4% id,  0.0% wa,  0.0% hi, 
0.0% si
  Cpu3 :  0.7% us,  0.7% sy,  0.0% ni, 98.7% id,  0.0% wa,  0.0% hi, 
0.0% si
Mem:   2075000k total,  2058560k used,    16440k free,    95528k buffers
Swap:  2096472k total,        8k used,  2096464k free,  1208892k cached

More likely we are passing something in on the command line it doesnt 
like -or the source or path is unsupported.
 


> 
>> Do we already have a Mono 1.0.1 available for Debian?
> 
> 
> I've forwarded the output/error to the Mono Debian list. If that goes 
> nowhere I'll try to report to any Mono list. Doing a Google I see a few 
> folks have posted this type of problem (on various versions) but I think 
> it might be a side-effect of abnormal termination. A bug yes, but a bug 
> due to an earlier  seemingly unrelated failure. Any way to run this with 
> more debug, or more information?
> 
> Is there a simpler test we can run? Can we work on a <nant target and do 
> some realy small simple things to start with and work up?
> 
> regards,
> 
> Adam
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message