Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-58357-apmail-ant-dev-archive=ant.apache.org@ant.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 98360 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2004 18:26:20 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Jun 2004 18:26:20 -0000
Received: (qmail 28208 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2004 18:26:33 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org
Received: (qmail 27953 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jun 2004 18:26:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dev-subscribe@ant.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@ant.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@ant.apache.org>
List-Id: "Ant Developers List" <dev.ant.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org
Received: (qmail 27940 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jun 2004 18:26:32 -0000
Received: from [134.132.72.99] (HELO junior.lgc.com) (134.132.72.99)
  by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 11:26:32 -0700
Received: from lgchvw01.lgc.com (lgchvw01.lgc.com [134.132.93.107])
	by junior.lgc.com (8.11.7/8.11.3) with SMTP id i54IP0422425
	for <dev@ant.apache.org>; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 13:25:00 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from 134.132.93.152 by lgchvw01.lgc.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall
 NT); Fri, 04 Jun 2004 13:26:05 -0500
Received: by lgchexchbh.ad.lgc.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
	id <K94XN2AA>; Fri, 4 Jun 2004 13:26:05 -0500
Message-ID: <EA6DC61E2B25A04F95FC0A84852CF2550263DE92@lgchexch007.ad.lgc.com>
From: Dominique Devienne <DDevienne@lgc.com>
To: "'Ant Developers List'" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Alias names for imported targets
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 13:26:04 -0500 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

> From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:jalberto@cellectivity.com]
> > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org]
> > On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Dominique Devienne <DDevienne@lgc.com> wrote:
> > > This allows to bypass the target override, and thus bypass whatever
> > > the overridden target does.
> >
> > Right.  But I already can bypass it if the target is
> > overridden since I get the aliased name then.  If this type
> > of bypassing is wrong, we shouldn't allow it in any way.
> >
> 
> This is one of my pifs with the current import, a battle I think I lost.
> Or maybe I won (I cannot remember which side I was :-(  )

Whoa, this is everything I tried and tried to explain, except never as
clearly, and I for sure lost that battle! I may be wrong, but the way I
remember it, you were in the camp that won ;-)

Thanks for this analysis. It's a lost cause, but thanks. --DD

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org