Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77482 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2004 20:56:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 2004 20:56:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 99541 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2004 20:57:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 99512 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2004 20:57:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 99494 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2004 20:57:10 -0000 Received: from [62.156.147.74] (HELO relay.t-online-com.de) (62.156.147.74) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 13:57:10 -0700 Received: from antbuild.com (internet-cafe-150.sapinternetcafe.de [155.56.24.150]) by relay.t-online-com.de (SMTPSVC(1.0.0.2)) with ESMTP id EC37214CD33 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 2004 22:46:34 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40BE3E99.2090601@antbuild.com> Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 22:54:49 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Antoine_L=E9vy-Lambert?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: Possible Ant 1.7 alpha bug: property expansion. References: <40BE3D86.C3D05DF7@purematrix.com> In-Reply-To: <40BE3D86.C3D05DF7@purematrix.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.82.4.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N In my opinion, the problem reported is a bug, even if for instance JDK 1.4 regexp has a similar bug. I would go for fixing the bug without BC, in order not to make the code too complicated. This is just me though. Cheers, Antoine Jack J. Woehr wrote: >Dominique Devienne wrote: > > > >>There's no such property, and any new 'magic' property will be a struggle to >>get past IMHO. Committers would have to chime in at this point... --DD >> >> > >It can be a command-line option or a property option. Looks like I can just implement PropertyHelper.replacePropertiesRecursively() >and make the use of it or PropertyHelper.replaceProperties() optional. > >-- >Jack J. Woehr # We have gone from the horse and buggy >Senior Consultant # to the moon rocket in one lifetime, but >Purematrix, Inc. # there has not been a corresponding moral >www.purematrix.com # growth in mankind. - Dwight D. Eisenhower > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org