Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Date: 2 Jun 2004 14:32:29 -0000
Message-ID: <20040602143229.7616.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org>
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Cc: 
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27541]  -
    JunitReport task fails under JDK 1.5

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27541>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27541

JunitReport task fails under JDK 1.5


------- Additional Comments From ddevienne@lgc.com  2004-06-02 14:32 -------
Well, I had a quick look at the XSL 2.0 spec, and they do have a <xsl:result-
document> element which allows outputting to several documents, so no need to 
rely on extensions theoretically. (Where I'm confused is how XSL 2.0 relates to 
XSL 1.1 which also has output to mutliple documents. No mention I could see in 
the spec!). Does XSLTC support <xsl:result-document> already?

So theoretically (again), we could apply a small transformation to the 
stylesheet itself to make it XSL 2.0 compatible, although rewritting the 
stylesheet for XSL 2.0 is another options. I worry about maintenance if we 
duplicate it though.

JDK 1.5 is such a big leap (of faith?)... One wonders if it hasn't too many new 
things. --DD

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org