Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-57218-apmail-ant-dev-archive=ant.apache.org@ant.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 67380 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2004 15:37:35 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Apr 2004 15:37:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 4202 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2004 15:37:26 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org
Received: (qmail 4155 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2004 15:37:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dev-subscribe@ant.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@ant.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@ant.apache.org>
List-Id: "Ant Developers List" <dev.ant.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org
Received: (qmail 4116 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2004 15:37:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO bodewig.bost.de) (62.96.16.111)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Apr 2004 15:37:25 -0000
Received: (from bodewig@localhost)
	by bodewig.bost.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) id i3JFbOV17781;
	Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:37:24 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: bodewig.bost.de: bodewig set sender to
 bodewig@apache.org using -f
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Subject: Re: AntCall manual typo?
X-Draft-From: ("nnfolder:mail.jakarta-ant" 58908)
References: <4083EF8D.C685661F@purematrix.com>
From: Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@apache.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:37:24 +0200
In-Reply-To: <4083EF8D.C685661F@purematrix.com> (Jack Woehr's message of
 "Mon, 19 Apr 2004 09:26:05 -0600")
Message-ID: <m3y8osq8qz.fsf@bodewig.bost.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through
 Obscurity, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Jack Woehr <jax@purematrix.com> wrote:

> I think "target" is meant here, not "project" in both these
> sentences.

No, project is correct.

<antcall> like Ant creates a complete new independent project
instance.  If we'd use "target" here, people would think we are
operating in the same context as the calling project - and so
properties and references created in the called target would persist
after the call - which we are not.

Stefan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org