ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan.Mate...@rzf.fin-nrw.de
Subject RE: Why are we having the branch after all? (was Re: cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes filterchain.html)
Date Fri, 23 Apr 2004 09:21:24 GMT
I cannot see any really major changes from 1.6 to HEAD so would prefer 1.6.2
as
name. 
And if we can get rid of the local 16_BRANCH I would be happy - holding
these two
trees partially in sync is not easy :-)

Jan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bodewig@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 11:17 AM
> To: dev@ant.apache.org
> Subject: Why are we having the branch after all? (was Re: cvs commit:
> ant/docs/manual/CoreTypes filterchain.html)
> 
> 
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Jan Materne <Jan.Materne@rzf.fin-nrw.de> wrote:
> 
> > Or should the 15390 be applied to 1.6 as well?
> 
> Given the amount of new features we are adding to the 1.6 branch, this
> has IMHO far outgrown a maintenance branch.  The difference between
> the 1.6 branch and CVS HEAD is very small and if soemthing ends up on
> the branch or not is purely arbitrary - I cannot see a theme here.
> 
> Maybe we should rather release a 1.7 from CVS HEAD instead of 1.6.2?
> Or release from CVS HEAD and call it 1.6.2?
> 
> Stefan
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
> 

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message