ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From bugzi...@apache.org
Subject DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22020] - [PATCH] addition of access atribute to <target..> task
Date Sat, 17 Apr 2004 21:10:13 GMT
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22020>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22020

[PATCH] addition of access atribute to <target..> task





------- Additional Comments From gudnabrsam@yahoo.com  2004-04-17 21:10 -------
I would agree that (1) is the simplest.  For clarification here and now, access 
defaults to "public".  I would treat the -* targets as a different issue; i.e. 
if a user can find a way to call a public (explicitly defined as such or 
otherwise) target named -* from the command line, they are welcome to do so.

As a long-overdue response to Gus's question(s) about the attached patch... I 
think an EnumeratedAttribute should be used for the access values... also, I 
don't know if the whole "access point" thing is warranted, especially if we 
choose that access is only relevant with respect to the command line.

$0.02

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org


Mime
View raw message