Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-56057-apmail-ant-dev-archive=ant.apache.org@ant.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 70298 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2004 16:59:57 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2004 16:59:57 -0000
Received: (qmail 82343 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2004 16:59:08 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org
Received: (qmail 82304 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2004 16:59:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dev-subscribe@ant.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@ant.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@ant.apache.org>
List-Id: "Ant Developers List" <dev.ant.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org
Received: (qmail 82218 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2004 16:59:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO dnsinet.rzf-nrw.de) (193.109.238.66)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2004 16:59:07 -0000
Received: from z011104.bk.fin.local (z011104.bk.fin.local [193.109.238.140])
	by dnsinet.rzf-nrw.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22Gx6MC028392
	for <dev@ant.apache.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:59:06 +0100
Received: by z011104.bk.fin.local with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
	id <G1RCVZ4W>; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:58:46 +0100
Message-ID: <879A5AD5DD0ED511891F0003473A9B560E23EE10@Z011004>
From: Jan.Materne@rzf.fin-nrw.de
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Subject: RE: BugID 27282 Misspelling: s/occured/occurred/g
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 17:59:08 +0100 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C40077.AD39EFA0"
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

------_=_NextPart_001_01C40077.AD39EFA0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> Honestly we should pick a single reference and a single locale and=20
> standardize on that. That way when a bug like this comes in=20
> we check the=20
> reference, and say yeah or nay without 6-10 emails of=20
> discussion. Given=20
> this discussion and the earlier mis pelt (my spell checker objects=20
> without the space :) ) discussion,=20

I agree. One reference adress (internet available, not a book :) and =
each
one can check, if there are doubts. Means: you _can_ check against a=20
defined reference, but you don=B4t have to...


> I think we should spend more time=20
> coding and less time spelling things out.

The most important mis-pellings ;) are catched by the compiler

   java.lng.Sstem.out.pintln("  :-)  ");



Jan

------_=_NextPart_001_01C40077.AD39EFA0--