Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 64806 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2004 21:12:25 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2004 21:12:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 7948 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2004 21:12:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 7909 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2004 21:12:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 7895 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2004 21:12:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.t-online-com.de) (62.156.147.74) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2004 21:12:11 -0000 Received: from apache.org (p5080e815.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.128.232.21]) by relay.t-online-com.de (SMTPSVC(1.0.0.1)) with ESMTP id 1B3BD1500EA for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 21:49:15 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4033D4AE.4090606@apache.org> Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 22:10:06 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Antoine_L=E9vy-Lambert?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: AntLikeTasksAtTopLevelTest References: <20040218191917.98223.qmail@web20421.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040218191917.98223.qmail@web20421.mail.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.82.4.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Matt Benson wrote: >For quite some time now (ever since I have dealt with >the Ant testcases) I have had this test fail every >time. Does this happen to anyone else? It seems that >the expected exception message is different from the >actual due to the fact that the actual message has >been wrapped by >ProjectHelper.addLocationToBuildException(). I have >been unable to find, so far, any reason this should >ever have worked differently. I could modify the test >case to make it pass... but that's not really the >point of a test case, is it? So has anyone else had >this problem? Am I missing something obvious? > >Thanks, >Matt > > > > > Hi Matt, this test fails for me under *cygwin* too, and I must admit that I did not dig into it more than that. This test passes in the gump build Actually, it passes (see [1]) : [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.AntLikeTasksAtTopLevelTest [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 5.882 sec Antoine [1] http://gump.cocoondev.org/test-ant.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org