Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Message-ID: <402758B5.4000304@antbuild.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 10:53:57 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Antoine_L=E9vy-Lambert?= <antoine@antbuild.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ant Developers List <dev@ant.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [GUMP@lsd]: ant/test-ant failed
References: <879A5AD5DD0ED511891F0003473A9B5608FF767E@Z011004>
In-Reply-To: <879A5AD5DD0ED511891F0003473A9B5608FF767E@Z011004>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Jan.Materne@rzf.fin-nrw.de wrote:

>Haven�t found any error.
>
>http://lsd.student.utwente.nl/gump/ant/work/build_ant_test-ant.html
>
>Start Time: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 05:58:45 (CET) 
>End Time: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 06:05:27 (CET) 
>
>BUILD SUCCESSFUL
>Total time: 6 minutes 37 seconds
>
>
>
>Maybe mail is from an older run ...
>
>
>Jan
>
>
>  
>
Hi Jan,

yes, the mail was from the Sunday run and was due to testspawn :-[  
in JavaTest.java or ExecTaskTest.java. In  both of these tests, I have 
now allocated 2 seconds for the process to start, so I hope that the 
probability of failure due to high load on
a test machine will go down to say 0.001%.

I tested this by running the build on my PC where I had started in 
parallel a CpuEater class. (looping adding +1 to a double).

Antoine

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org