ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
Subject RE: [GUMP@lsd]: ant/test-ant failed
Date Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:57:37 GMT
> I am +1 for option 1, though I do note Gus Heck's point about 
> the merits 
> of an override option, though of course that gets 
> controversial in the 
> details:
> C++ off by default; virtual enables, virtual functions not 
> valid in ctor
> Java: on by default; final disables, virtual methods valid in ctor
> C#: off by default, override enables, dont know about ctor semantics.
> then there is public, private, etc.

There are some entries in BugZilla according to that

adding visibility to tasks

add optional attribute to target element to specify visibility
(duplicate of 6757)

[PATCH] addition of access atribute to <target..> task


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message