ant-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan.Mate...@rzf.fin-nrw.de
Subject RE: [GUMP@lsd]: ant/test-ant failed
Date Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:57:37 GMT
> I am +1 for option 1, though I do note Gus Heck's point about 
> the merits 
> of an override option, though of course that gets 
> controversial in the 
> details:
> 
> C++ off by default; virtual enables, virtual functions not 
> valid in ctor
> Java: on by default; final disables, virtual methods valid in ctor
> C#: off by default, override enables, dont know about ctor semantics.
> 
> then there is public, private, etc.


There are some entries in BugZilla according to that

adding visibility to tasks 
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6757

add optional attribute to target element to specify visibility 
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10826
(duplicate of 6757)

[PATCH] addition of access atribute to <target..> task 
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22020



Jan

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message