Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31890 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2004 16:10:57 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2004 16:10:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 55531 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2004 13:24:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 55308 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2004 13:24:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 55295 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2004 13:24:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 137100.vserver.de) (62.75.137.100) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2004 13:24:12 -0000 Received: from antbuild.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by 137100.vserver.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0QDO7h07680 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 14:24:08 +0100 Message-ID: <40151488.5040604@antbuild.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 14:22:16 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Antoine_L=E9vy-Lambert?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: New Apache License References: <4014D737.3040106@antbuild.com> <4014EE7B.3020901@iseran.com> <4014F033.8090601@antbuild.com> <401511C3.7080803@iseran.com> In-Reply-To: <401511C3.7080803@iseran.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.82.4.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Steve Loughran wrote: > >>> >>> >> Do you foresee some opposition to the new license ? >> > > > I have yet to probe. I know the lawyers were very, very, very unhappy > at the original draft as its patent scope was too broad: > http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=license@apache.org&msgNo=49 > > > > Hi Steve, You are referring to this paragraph under this link http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/ReadMsg?listName=license@apache.org&msgNo=49 : "If You institute patent litigation against a Contributor with respect to a patent applicable to software (including a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit), then any patent licenses granted by that Contributor to You under this License shall terminate as of the date such litigation is filed." This paragraph now looks like this : http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 * 3. Grant of Patent License*. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer the Work, where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable by such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their Contribution(s) alone or by combination of their Contribution(s) with the Work to which such Contribution(s) was submitted. If You institute patent litigation against any entity (including a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that the Work or a Contribution incorporated within the Work constitutes direct or contributory patent infringement, then any patent licenses granted to You under this License for that Work shall terminate as of the date such litigation is filed. The current version of this paragraph sounds more balanced to me. Antoine --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org