Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
From: Conor MacNeill <conor@cortexebusiness.com.au>
To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bug Tracking System
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:48:32 +1100
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <129B3F1047B07C4F9B07759E77DB00F56117F8@360t_sv01.fft.360t.com>
In-Reply-To: <129B3F1047B07C4F9B07759E77DB00F56117F8@360t_sv01.fft.360t.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200401100048.32730.conor@cortexebusiness.com.au>

On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:22 am, Svetlin Stanchev wrote:
> If I may ask, was the Open Source issue-tracking system Scarab
> (http://scarab.tigris.org/) considered as replacement for BugZilla?
>
> Jira is nice, indeed, but not OS, only borrowed to OS projects.
>
> Does it have smth to do with CollabNet's

Svetlin, 

Each ASF project is relatively free to decide upon the resources it wishes to 
use to manage its project. We are not restricted to using OS software. There 
is in fact a scarab instance available so this has nothing to do with 
CollabNet in any way that I am aware of. 

OTOH, since I don't think any of us here wish to maintain and manage the bug 
tracking system, we are more likely to transition to a system which has the 
best chance of being actively maintained and administered. IMHO, at the 
moment, that looks like Jira. IOW, someone has stepped forward and is doing 
the heavy lifting to setup Jira. I have not seen the same happening for the 
alternatives.

Conor


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org