Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91564 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2003 14:48:14 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Dec 2003 14:48:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 15051 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2003 14:48:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 15019 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2003 14:48:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 15006 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2003 14:48:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO london.cellectivity.com) (212.18.242.163) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Dec 2003 14:48:07 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: ANT1.6 much more slower than 1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C3BF2C.9FEC8EB0" Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:48:07 -0000 Message-ID: <747F247264ECE34CA60E323FEF0CCC0C5D0934@london.cellectivity.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: ANT1.6 much more slower than 1.5 Thread-Index: AcO/LJ/hvj7zpC2tSpyqoZWFD8K8Xw== From: "Jose Alberto Fernandez" To: X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------_=_NextPart_001_01C3BF2C.9FEC8EB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable OK, here are some more issues. I am running the my main build in ANT 1.6 vs 1.5 and I am getting very disapointing numbers: On ANT1.5 a full build takes 9m23s On ANT1.6b3 the same build takes 14m12s (!!!!!) On ANT1.6b3 a modified version of the build takes 11m3s This is after modifying the build for 1.6 to use in a couple of obvious places instead of . This is on a build file with over 2500 lines and with numerous and loops. I can extrapolate from this two things: a) really helps in 1.6. b) I will have to convert a lot of the code to just get the performance I had before. If I move the rest of the developers to 1.6 as is, they will kill me. They already complain the build takes too long. Any insight on what we should look into? We cannot ship 1.6 with such issues, I do not think. Jose Alberto ------_=_NextPart_001_01C3BF2C.9FEC8EB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C3BF2C.9FEC8EB0--