Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49672 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2003 07:42:29 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Oct 2003 07:42:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 83461 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2003 07:42:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 83409 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2003 07:42:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 83390 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2003 07:42:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 137100.vserver.de) (62.75.137.100) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Oct 2003 07:42:11 -0000 Received: from D2CFT80J (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated) by 137100.vserver.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h9M7gKD07532 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 09:42:21 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Antoine_L=E9vy-Lambert?= To: "Ant Developers List" Subject: AW: Vote: for 1.6 Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 09:41:17 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-reply-to: <200310221001.06484.conor@cortexebusiness.com.au> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I am OK for the third beta. In the third beta we should have : - the properties, - a new xml-apis.jar (probably the one which is distributed with Xerces-Java 2.5) - can we also have the endorsed libraries ? - other points ? Once these changes are done - hopefully soon - we will set new dates (for the third beta and for 1.6.0) Cheers, Antoine -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Conor MacNeill [mailto:conor@cortexebusiness.com.au] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Oktober 2003 02:01 An: Ant Developers List Betreff: Re: Vote: for 1.6 On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 01:35 am, peter reilly wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to put the local property patch into ant 1.6. > > Normally I would wait for 1.7 for this, but it has a big > and (I think) beneficial impact on . > > The changes to macrodef are not Backward Compatible > with the current implementation. > > The task declares properties that only exist > for the current scope, where scope is a target, or > a sequential (any taskcontainer) or a macro instance. > > The patch is in > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23942 > I think that such a change should require a third beta and an extension of the release timeframe. I've just had a quick look at the code and wonder if the change in parallel could be avoided by copying on demand from the parent thread. Parallel uses ThreadGroups to make this possible already. Conor --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org