Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-52191-apmail-ant-dev-archive=ant.apache.org@ant.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 29336 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2003 09:31:14 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Oct 2003 09:31:14 -0000
Received: (qmail 54804 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2003 09:30:54 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org
Received: (qmail 54763 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2003 09:30:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dev-subscribe@ant.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@ant.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@ant.apache.org>
List-Id: "Ant Developers List" <dev.ant.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org
Received: (qmail 54709 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2003 09:30:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO london.cellectivity.com) (212.18.242.163)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Oct 2003 09:30:53 -0000
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: Vote: <local> for 1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 10:31:06 +0100
Message-ID: <747F247264ECE34CA60E323FEF0CCC0C5D08D9@london.cellectivity.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Vote: <local> for 1.6
Thread-Index: AcOYJ7N/uPXM2dUbTfepmHbOnfa+jgAVzwig
From: "Jose Alberto Fernandez" <jalberto@cellectivity.com>
To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

>From another non commiter:
I would also like to see it in. It would save me having lots of
silly variables all over just for the sake of passing some value for one
task to the next.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shatzer, Larry [mailto:Larry.Shatzer@Spirent.com]=20
> Sent: 22 October 2003 00:04
> To: 'Ant Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Vote: <local> for 1.6
>=20
>=20
> Since I am not a commiter, my vote won't count, but I am +1=20
> for this. It solves my original problem perfectly.
>=20
> -- Larry
>=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: peter reilly [mailto:peter.reilly@corvil.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 8:36 AM
> > To: dev@ant.apache.org
> > Subject: Vote: <local> for 1.6
> >=20
> >=20
> > Hi all,
> >=20
> > I would like to put the local property patch into ant 1.6.
> >=20
> > Normally I would wait for 1.7 for this, but it has a big
> > and (I think) beneficial impact on <macrodef/>.
> >=20
> > The changes to macrodef are not Backward Compatible
> > with the current implementation.
> >=20
> > The <local> task declares properties that only exist
> > for the current scope, where scope is a target, or
> > a sequential (any taskcontainer) or a macro instance.
> >=20
> > The patch is in=20
> > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D23942
> >=20
> > Peter
>=20
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>=20
>=20

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org