Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-52197-apmail-ant-dev-archive=ant.apache.org@ant.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 83621 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2003 13:24:46 -0000
Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12)
  by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Oct 2003 13:24:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 30631 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2003 13:24:41 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org
Received: (qmail 30456 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2003 13:24:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dev-subscribe@ant.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@ant.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@ant.apache.org>
List-Id: "Ant Developers List" <dev.ant.apache.org>
Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" <dev@ant.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org
Received: (qmail 30442 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2003 13:24:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO exchange.sun.com) (192.18.33.10)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Oct 2003 13:24:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 5381 invoked by uid 50); 22 Oct 2003 13:27:49 -0000
Date: 22 Oct 2003 13:27:49 -0000
Message-ID: <20031022132749.5380.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org>
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: dev@ant.apache.org
Cc: 
Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23920]  -
    Contains selector test fails on JDK 1.2.2 and IBM JDK 1.4.1
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23920>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23920

Contains selector test fails on JDK 1.2.2 and IBM JDK 1.4.1





------- Additional Comments From bodewig@apache.org  2003-10-22 13:27 -------
<contains> like any other selector that tries to look into the files may
benefit from an encoding attribute, I agree.

Although I doubt that you'd find an encoding that would work for arbitrary
binary files at all - so maybe the selector should skip the file (and log a
message about being unable to read binary file XYZ?).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org