Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99441 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2003 20:19:35 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Oct 2003 20:19:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 53092 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2003 20:19:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 53049 invoked by uid 500); 21 Oct 2003 20:19:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 53030 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2003 20:19:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO exchange.sun.com) (192.18.33.10) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Oct 2003 20:19:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 5146 invoked by uid 50); 21 Oct 2003 20:22:32 -0000 Date: 21 Oct 2003 20:22:32 -0000 Message-ID: <20031021202232.5145.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: dev@ant.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23919] - [PATCH] nightly build and ant 1.6 not buildable with jdk 1.2.2 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23919 [PATCH] nightly build and ant 1.6 not buildable with jdk 1.2.2 ------- Additional Comments From ant@kruithof.xs4all.nl 2003-10-21 20:22 ------- Hi, on the last issue mentioned I wrote a separate bug report as it also fails for the IBM JDK. Its bug id 23920. Regarding the encoding ISO-8859-1 cannot contain all Unicode characters, but contains only a subset. A subset of this and many other encodings is US-ASCII, which seems to match with the rest of the codebase. Why should code set ISO 8859-1 be selected to develop with, as said taking only a subset would match many encodings, while also ISO 8859-1 is a subset of the entire Unicode space. Chooosing character set 8859-1 is choosing an obsolete character set (it has been superseded by 8859-15 at least in western europe afaik) which makes it harder to develop for people that normally use an other encoding (while working with a lot of different encodings, certainly the entire ISO 8859 series, KOI8-R various ms-dos codepages and UTF-8 work as long as everyone uses the common ASCII subset) Furthermore the transition to the UTF-8 encoding, which allows all unicode characters is ruled out by using ISO 8859-1. Therefore imho choosing ISO 8859-1 isn't going to make developing on ant easier for a lot of people, and will even make it more difficult to go to the only Unicode encoding variant we currently comply with (UTF-8) if we wanted to support all unicode characters in the ant source. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org