Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 65686 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2003 18:16:19 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2003 18:16:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 70714 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2003 18:16:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ant-dev-archive@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 70671 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2003 18:16:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@ant.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Ant Developers List" Reply-To: "Ant Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list dev@ant.apache.org Received: (qmail 70656 invoked from network); 17 Sep 2003 18:16:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO relay.t-online-com.de) (62.156.147.74) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Sep 2003 18:16:03 -0000 Received: from D2CFT80J (internet-cafe-221.sapinternetcafe.de [155.56.24.221]) by relay.t-online-com.de (SMTPSVC(1.0.0.2)) with ESMTP id C328914CAA3 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2003 20:10:42 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Antoine_L=E9vy-Lambert?= To: "Ant Developers List" Subject: AW: Should cause an error when used inside a ? Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 20:15:20 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <200309171521.02123.peter.reilly@corvil.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sounds good, Antoine -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- Von: peter reilly [mailto:peter.reilly@corvil.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. September 2003 16:21 An: Ant Developers List Betreff: Re: Should cause an error when used inside a ? On Wednesday 17 September 2003 13:24, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, peter reilly wrote: > > I think that the use-case is valid. > > Hmm, maybe - given the timing of Antoine's release plan - we should > limit to top-level right now and revisit nesteing import into > targets later? The original implementation was a bit hachy (modifing the vector of tasks in target while reading it). I have made a new implementation that makes a new target for top level tasks of imported files and executes them in the same way as normal top level tasks. This implementation does handle your use-case (I think) and sequential. may be a problem - need to think about protecting access to the antcontext object in PH2. Peter > > > One should also think about an inside a sequential. > > Aaargh. inside will be even more fun. > > Stefan > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org